Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_X409FJ

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_X409FJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409FJ
Memory	2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200429
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '23 at 23:39
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 48.5 1-Core 84 2-Core 138 51% 90.2 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 301 30% 246 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 117F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	4.09% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 7.1 4% 9.23 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 0.2 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.09% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GB 2,949 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 337 319 384 302 460 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 484 Write 453 Mixed 276 SusWrite 362 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 21.7 96% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 485 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 364 280% 385 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 203%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 04CB 12GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 13.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 12.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	54	60	13.9"	1280 720	CMN14D6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_X409FJ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FJ_X409FJ

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	31x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	9x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	29x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	14x

SSD
WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 169%, 2,949 samples	6x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	5x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	4x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	11x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 04CB 12GBMicronBench 51%, 64 samples	5x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 04CB 8GBMicronBench 60%, 57 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16