Acer Veriton S670G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton S670G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EQ45M
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 19:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9505-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 87.8
44% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 140
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 18.1
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAI20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 174 188 200 220 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 231
Write 214
Mixed 203
SusWrite 198
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 23.2
81% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 115
100% 150 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 46 144 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical Veriton S670G Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton S670G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback