Lenovo 7D8JCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 7D8JCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault 1052
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 18:38
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2324G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 313
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 560
75% 561 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Legend(17AA 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.29% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 10.2
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 8.9
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.29%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 456GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 341 316 383 325 362 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 888
Write 354
Mixed 367
SusWrite 340
108% 487 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 22.3
84% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 164
170% 282 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97%
Great: 123%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.7
Write 13.4
Mixed 18.7
34% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
86% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung CME4WEC8C2K1472SDV 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 18.5" 1280 720 HPN3539 HP V19b
Typical 7D8JCTO1WW Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7D8JCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback