Medion MD34140/2563

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMedion MD34140/2563  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B350A4-EM
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 221
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 623
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 87.9
77% 93.1 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 87.3
Splatting 76.5
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 0.6 25 37 49 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,105
Write 137
Mixed 937
SusWrite 37.3
122% 554 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 47.2
147% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 1.7
110% 283 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 187%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
358GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 373 315 320 322 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 442
Mixed 347
SusWrite 350
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 51.1
169% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 346
265% 360 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
457GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 459 432 451 457 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 471
Mixed 444
SusWrite 452
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 51.3
168% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
517GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 99 101 103 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 91.1
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 100
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 93%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 250GB
129GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 36 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 55.9
Write 28.8
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 36.9
42% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 32.7
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2701 27G1G4
Typical MD34140/2563 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MD34140/2563

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback