Monster ABRA A5 V6.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V6.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V6.1
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 07:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 158
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 331
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Clevo(1558 5500) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8927
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 16.4
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 12.7
13% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 137 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 401
Write 408
Mixed 379
SusWrite 130
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 34.4
113% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 240
185% 253 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 GKH800SO51208-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04A7
Typical ABRA A5 V6.1 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V6.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback