Monster ABRA A7 V5.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V5.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V5.2
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 23:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 172
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 458
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Clevo(1558 6505) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 18.1
0% 14 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.7
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 63 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 118
Write 105
Mixed 31
SusWrite 65.1
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
393GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 89.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 100
58% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 GKH800SO51208-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V5.2 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V5.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback