Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory179.5 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 03:55
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 63
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
79% 149 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 888
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1843
114% 1843 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
MSI(1462 5090) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 279
Parallax 308
150% 257 fps
MRender 324
Gravity 277
Splatting 188
207% 263 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 156%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 1561 1529 1532 1549 1540 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 1,954
Write 1,765
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 1,544
392% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 92.5
301% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 889
668% 899 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 307%
Great: 526%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
241GB free
Firmware: R040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 290 295 293 302 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 290
Write 420
Mixed 336
SusWrite 297
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 31.1
122% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 342
256% 341 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 105%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
658GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 405
Mixed 407
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 47
162% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion HDD 14TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 184
Mixed 118
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 0.2
37% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 0.5
3% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
610GB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 186 187 187 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139
1TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 177 177 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3600C18 6x31.8GB
6 of 8 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 13.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 9.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 100 34.1" 1280 727 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback