Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 19:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 178
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 396
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 18FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 6.3
5% 18.2 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 121 74 64 78 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 452
Write 257
Mixed 318
SusWrite 114
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 27.9
101% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 190
164% 242 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 22.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0029
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback