PC OptimusIX 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemPC OptimusIX 15  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO N8xxEP6
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 171
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 646
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 28.1 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 173 185 121 96 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 437
Write 406
Mixed 295
SusWrite 148
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 34.3
117% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 259
215% 311 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
569GB free
Firmware: U0916A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 366 364 354 388 390 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 272
Write 349
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 373
181% 253 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 0.1
1,564% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 0.6
651% 146 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4X8GF2133C15S2 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 18 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO70ED
Typical OptimusIX 15 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: PC OptimusIX 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback