IGEL M340C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIGEL M340C  (all builds)
MotherboardIGEL M340C
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 07:30
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-424CC SOC R5E Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 31
2-Core 56.9
32% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 84.2
8-Core 92
12% 88.1 Pts
64-Core 95
6% 95 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics
AMD(1002 9851) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.4
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 43 41 42 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46% Average
Read 338
Write 297
Mixed 251
SusWrite 68.9
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 19.5
67% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 155
121% 166 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 46%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-065.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 43 16 60 18.9" 1280 961 BTD1913
Typical M340C Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: IGEL M340C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback