HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A50
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 43.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 309
85% 170 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 51.5
49% 283 Pts
64-Core 85
5% 85 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A50) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 9.2
7% 16.6 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 12.9
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1624 1170 1343 1400 968 731 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,924
Write 1472
Mixed 1,173
SusWrite 1,206
323% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 38.5
130% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 518
329% 377 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 205%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Ramaxel RMSA3310MF96HAF-3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 20
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 23.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 45 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE094D
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx Builds (Compare 4,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback