MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime23.9 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 164
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 449
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 28.2
25% 33.5 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 35
Splatting 25.9
26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 156 153 152 149 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,397
Write 715
Mixed 501
SusWrite 159
152% 693 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 43
142% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 502
361% 474 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 130%
Great: 234%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
464GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 350 359 359 391 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 409
Mixed 366
SusWrite 354
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 40.2
127% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 340
259% 349 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 075D GR2400S464L17S/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 14.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15D6
Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback