Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X3400PH
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 20:24
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 273
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 629
67% 534 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 189C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4338
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 50.3
Parallax 24.2
17% 31.8 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 16.3
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNG-L3A0B 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80050C10 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 660 703 720 720 722 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 1,426
Mixed 700
SusWrite 762
250% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 63
250% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 795
654% 934 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 231%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 90 14" 1280 720 SDC4171
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback