MSI H310M PRO-VDH (MS-7B29)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B29
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH (MS-7B29)  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221012
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 19:43
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 107
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 272
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
MSI(1462 397D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 105
Parallax 124
107% 120 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 105
Splatting 90.1
78% 95.6 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ventuz SATA SSD 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 143 159 145 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 353
Write 305
Mixed 322
SusWrite 142
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 17.5
74% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 15.6
58% 127 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
179GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 113
Write 129
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 119
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABD064 640GB
164GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 74.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 59.5
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 23.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 10% 10 187 16 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical H310M PRO-VDH (MS-7B29) Builds (Compare 1,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH (MS-7B29)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback