Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 13:32
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 756
79% 632 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 83.9
73% 87.8 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80
Splatting 71.7
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,488
Write 1,384
Mixed 1,775
416% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 78.7
262% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 856
633% 844 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 136 137 135 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 124
Write 113
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 136
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1.1
52% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1.9
3% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
192GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 63 68 67 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
268GB free
Firmware: GG2OA7B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 67 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 72.5
Write 45.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 67.6
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 152 150 152 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 163
Write 144
Mixed 121
SusWrite 151
194% 145 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.8
409% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
338% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.6
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27.9" 1280 720 PHLC231 PHL 288E2
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback