Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 22:03
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 253
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 791
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 84
74% 88.2 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 72.1
70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,594
Write 2,364
Mixed 1806
502% 2,255 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 82.6
272% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 794
604% 826 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 133 134 133 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 125
Write 104
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 134
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.1
14% 5.67 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
192GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 57 56 60 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 63.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 58.6
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
268GB free
Firmware: GG2OA7B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 69 69 69 70 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 54.2
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 66.3
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 158 157 159 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 149
Mixed 109
SusWrite 158
195% 146 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.8
450% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 26.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 12% 16 566 468 60 27.9" 1920 1080 PHLC231 PHL 288E2
History: Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B | Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback