Intel NUC10i7FNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC10i7FNH
MotherboardIntel NUC10i7FNB  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 110
2-Core 213
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 610
64% 513 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2081) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.6
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G1R0A-68A4W0 500GB
257GB free
Firmware: 411000WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 262 261 219 231 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 391
Write 260
Mixed 206
SusWrite 243
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 32.4
111% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 233
190% 272 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,116
Write 874
Mixed 632
194% 874 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 46.9
161% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 549
371% 459 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5663-005.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.5" 1280 720 PHLC0CD PHL 193V5
Typical NUC10i7FNB Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC10i7FNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback