TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 05:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 900
89% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 96.3%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF9)
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 168
Parallax 186
123% 169 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 152
Splatting 126
125% 158 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 1454 1654 1732 1749 1745 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1730
Write 1,696
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 1,572
372% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.3
196% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,213
909% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑
This bench: 280%
 Great: 488%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
137GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 126 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 167
Write 153
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 126
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 84.3%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 04CB DDR4 3000 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 69.1%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 3R 5G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 33% 67 187 9 165 31.5" 1920 1080 GSM775C LG ULTRAGEAR
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB Builds (Compare 2,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples1,633x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $429Bench 98%, 354,223 samples170x
Core i9-9900KFIntel  $281Bench 98%, 50,265 samples152x
GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia  $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples1,230x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples207x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples125x
SSD
AS340 480GBApacerBench 73%, 5,317 samples154x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples140x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples123x
RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples808x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples100x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples80x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback