MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 19:19
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 316
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 875
83% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 266
Parallax 203
185% 232 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 159
Splatting 141
137% 172 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Visiontek 512GB Pro XPN 512GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAT7GD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 488 511 512 511 511 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,175
Write 1,735
Mixed 566
SusWrite 569
279% 1,261 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 64.7
220% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 564
532% 828 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 233%
Great: 284%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
27GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 70 71 67 90 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 498
Write 288
Mixed 273
SusWrite 95.1
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 16.3
125% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 129
123% 202 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72%
Great: 115%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 491 492 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 496
Mixed 440
SusWrite 492
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 60.8
208% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 128%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4,570
Mixed 1.7
1,505% 2286 MB/s
4K Read 115
4K Mixed 0
639% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.8
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 VSCA938 VX2785-2K
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback