Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H55M-D2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120206
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateDec 17 '17 at 10:47
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 75
2-Core 121
54% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 207
Write 138
Mixed 154
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 13.9
76% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 13.4
22% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 79%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
229GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 66.6
Mixed 37.7
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Samsung SP4002H 40GB
22GB free
Firmware: QU100-60
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 40.3
Mixed 14.9
23% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.32
76% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 11.9
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2H Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $73
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback