Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_K571LH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_K571LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571LH
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 08:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 660
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 1002) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.8% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 50.7
Parallax 50.7
39% 49.9 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 37.4
37% 47.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 22 11 220 24 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,101
Mixed 840
SusWrite 157
194% 873 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.8
190% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 466
390% 564 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 153%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 33 0 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0563
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_K571LH Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_K571LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback