Default X133

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Default X133 (all builds)
Motherboard	Default X133
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221215
Uptime	20 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '23 at 20:03
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 43.4 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 143 47% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 255 33% 250 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.12% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.4 Parallax 0.2 4% 4.07 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 0.1 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shiji 512GB 512GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 25 177 6 4.6 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 168 Write 125 Mixed 338 SusWrite 89.4 41% 180 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 19.6 82% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 38.8 88% 178 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung D24D4S7S8MA-8 2x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (84^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.5% Above average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.9 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.8 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	21%	28	31	2	60	16"	1536 960	CMN1618

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X133 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Default X133

CPU
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	16x
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	14x
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	18x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	18x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	9x

SSD
512GB 512GBShijiBench 74%, 72 samples	8x
1TB 1TBShijiBench 87%, 49 samples	8x
256GB 256GBShijiBench 64%, 49 samples	4x

RAM
D24D4S7S8MA-8 2x8GBSamsungBench 48%, 25 samples	20x
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples	13x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16