Default X133

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemDefault X133  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X133
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime39.2 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 28.1
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 115
36% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 188
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 5.1
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 128GB 128GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1207A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 286 299 274 295 265 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 333
Write 271
Mixed 305
SusWrite 280
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 11.4
54% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 40
73% 142 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung D24D4S7S8MA-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.5
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 266
15% 266 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X133 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Default X133

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback