Acer Aspire TC-1660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-1660  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-1660
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220412
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 749
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1515) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-000AC 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 183 174 238 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 771
Write 109
Mixed 345
SusWrite 198
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 36.1
129% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 216
190% 293 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 4ATF51264AZ-3G2J1 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 9.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 29.7" 1280 720 HWP2690 HP LP3065
Typical Aspire TC-1660 Builds (Compare 716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-1660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback