bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DP67BG
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '23 at 17:01
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 193 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 317 42% 313 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 332 Write 108 Mixed 155 43% 198 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 25.3 88% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 121 94% 129 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 83%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 28GB free Firmware: 5.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 126 123 119 125 113 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 367 Write 188 Mixed 188 SusWrite 124 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 34.2 116% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 129 119% 182 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 83%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 98GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 249 250 249 247 251 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.2% Very good	Read 222 Write 200 Mixed 200 SusWrite 245 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 38.7 123% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x434D4C384758334D32413136303043392020 4x4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.3 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	52	18	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,035x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,577x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	939x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,050x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	518x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	378x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16