Lenovo 90NC00GFMZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90NC00GFMZ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3717
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$228
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 198
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 792
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 82
73% 86.4 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 69.1
68% 85.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 665 694 720 682 610 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1994
Write 2,165
Mixed 1,750
SusWrite 711
372% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 67.6
225% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 903
673% 897 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 233%
Great: 278%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 209 207 212 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6DJR8N-WM 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 29
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 16.6" 1920 1080 OOO0000 MA2224W
Typical 90NC00GFMZ Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 90NC00GFMZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback