Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER LGFA 001
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime20.7 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 14:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 154
57% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 302
32% 257 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Quanta(152D 1317) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 8.2
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 5.9
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR046 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 532 537 649 457 451 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 656
Write 798
Mixed 683
SusWrite 511
150% 662 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 42
152% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 396
284% 374 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 120%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 12.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback