PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel DQ67OW |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181024 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 02 '23 at 13:47 |
Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 12 11 51 68 51 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Hs-ssd-minder(s) 120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 24 19 53 69 52 MB/s
|
21%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33
64GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.6 5.8 5 5 5.6 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
499GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 130 128 124 125 MB/s
|
83.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$28
2GB free
Firmware: 0002BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 32 31 32 32 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Generic External 320GB
84GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30% | 11% | 122 | 184 | 9 | 60 | 22" | 1920 1080 | HAN2200 2120H75 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 18x |
Core i3-2120Intel $146Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 4x |
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 2x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |