Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 10:07
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 39.9
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 147
47% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 254
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 250
15% 250 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KUU-512GB 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 227 310 305 297 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 328
Write 266
Mixed 308
SusWrite 290
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 13.9
53% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 43.6
87% 173 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 HKC3CFB
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback