Lenovo 81LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81LF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 06:45
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ATG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 548
57% 457 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L1QEXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1675
Write 1,398
Mixed 997
301% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 48.9
160% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 549
405% 535 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 241%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
117GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 145 216 198 172 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 386
Write 338
Mixed 277
SusWrite 184
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 6.4
48% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 33.9
40% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 45%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06FB
Typical 81LF Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 81LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback