Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 03:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 112
51% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 149
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.3% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 74.8
62% 76.1 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 60
54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 200 199 215 218 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 219
Write 207
Mixed 215
SusWrite 203
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 34.9
108% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 157
120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 105%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 90.1
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 91.8
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 14GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback