Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '23 at 03:22
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 68 2-Core 118 51% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 169 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Zotac(19DA 1583) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.2% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 77 Parallax 74.8 63% 76.3 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 74.7 Splatting 60.8 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 12,305 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 204 204 221 225 213 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.6% Good	Read 222 Write 220 Mixed 193 SusWrite 203 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 38.9 132% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 161 122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 105%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 83 82 85 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 90.1 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 84.6 61% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 14GB 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.2% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 10.7 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	58	60	26"	1280 720	XXX0000 AAA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	13x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 500 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	3x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16