HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 213E
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200218
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '23 at 03:12
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600U 26,548 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 55.3 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 73 40% 61.7 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 110 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 92.2 6% 92.2 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 213E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 3.9 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 62 46 30 33 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 253 Write 28.2 Mixed 42.1 SusWrite 45.7 20% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 1.8 35% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 96.2 86% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	32	15	60	27"	1280 720	HPN3521 HP V270

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1

CPU
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples	12x
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	10x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	24x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 76%, 2,150 samples	11x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	3x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 94 samples	5x
HMT451B6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 8GBHynixBench 48%, 173 samples	5x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 36 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16