Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 21:21
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1066
98% 821 Pts
64-Core 1103
68% 1103 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB; saphire Nitro+
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 138
Parallax 300
111% 191 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 150
Splatting 208
165% 202 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 339 344 350 353 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 357
Mixed 332
SusWrite 345
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 40.5
142% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 264
223% 324 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
119GB free
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 293 288 293 295 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 495
Write 289
Mixed 249
SusWrite 292
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 32
116% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 124
128% 214 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 91%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
647GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 835 838 835 835 837 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
862GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 192 191 191 191 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 144
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 190
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 25.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 27.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 57% 28 217 59 60 27" 2560 1440 AOC2730 AG273QS4R4
History: Score 32: 0P 2R 6G 4B | Score 48: 0P 5R 6G 5B
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $600
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback