Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '17 at 23:47
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 98.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 288 98% 177 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 890 88% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,151 71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 872F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4758 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.86% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 8.44 7% 9.45 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 15.9 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.86% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4 3,426 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 2,007 Write 1,173 Mixed 1,313 331% 1,497 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 62.9 222% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 871 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 212 258% 469 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 219%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 162GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1251 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 773 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 66 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 54 (EB) Unknown 99 99 98 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5024650213	112% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 389 Mixed 413 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 46.5 174% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 115 139% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 951GB free Firmware: CC9B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 169978720 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3148 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9898318 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9420 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2739 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 64 4665507862 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 33845 (C2) HDA temperature 22 40 -140737488355306 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 71940702213996 (F1) Unknown 100 253 58167636882439 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -121369166459452	79% Very good	Read 137 Write 138 Mixed 123 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.33 92% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 113%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 16GB-$29 119 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 14GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 111 Write 35.9 Mixed 44.3 67% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.65 77% 4.04 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 2,692 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 28.8 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 38.1 SC Mixed 33.1 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 45.7 88% 45.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	304x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	197x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	147x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16