MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 19:12
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 677
74% 584 Pts
64-Core 720
44% 720 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.7
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.4
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
632GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1485 777 589 448 433 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 1,510
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 697
270% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51.8
167% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 907
673% 892 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 190%
Great: 269%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
236GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 333 359 356 384 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 435
Mixed 368
SusWrite 345
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 50.1
155% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 160 161 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 174
Write 154
Mixed 102
SusWrite 160
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.1
65% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 184 184 184 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 212
Write 177
Mixed 118
SusWrite 184
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 1.1
56% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 39%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
773GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 87 87 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 71.7
Write 66
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 85.8
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 111 109 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 98.9
Write 73.6
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 110
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 96%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 30.9
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 36.4
47% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
69% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 49%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 34.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 35.9
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 71%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.2
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 35.7
46% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 71%
SanDisk SD ExpCard Adpt 64GB
0GB free, PID b6d0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 18.4
Write 14.2
Mixed 7
15% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 1.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.M16FB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.7" 1280 720 VSCE226 VX2450 SERIES
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback