Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration745 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 145
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 462
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 102
55% 77.4 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 44
49% 62.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 83 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 299
Write 232
Mixed 290
SusWrite 25.6
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 32.8
110% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 301
234% 322 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 480GB
213GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 316 119 64 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 296
Write 238
Mixed 240
SusWrite 119
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 10.1
41% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 96.7
DQ Mixed 42.3
49% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 68%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
219GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 347 355 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
871GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 195 195 183 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 76 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 77.4
Write 62.6
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 25.6
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 71%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 4TB
3TB free, PID 5100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 177 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 118
Write 98.8
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 59
113% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
40% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback