Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 103
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 501
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.3% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 92.4
55% 73.9 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 45.4
49% 62.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 239 70 80 65 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 437
Write 328
Mixed 312
SusWrite 121
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 28.3
98% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 321
244% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 480GB
213GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 184 89 44 58 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 416
Write 329
Mixed 268
SusWrite 123
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 15.1
62% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 93.8
DQ Mixed 43.5
50% 85 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 68%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
219GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 236 300 335 325 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 208
Write 276
Mixed 320
SusWrite 292
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 25.1
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 141
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
871GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 207 207 209 202 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 77 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 75.4
Write 75.1
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 76.3
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 71%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 4TB
3TB free, PID 5100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 177 170 173 160 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 125
Write 148
Mixed 103
SusWrite 168
189% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 58%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 16 75 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback