Lenovo 80Y5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80Y5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-5R5
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 01:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 23
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 175
47% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 483
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 30.4
24% 29.8 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 0.3
16% 21.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 164 165 165 164 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 720
Mixed 452
SusWrite 181
126% 565 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 36.5
112% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 223
176% 241 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 226%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 127 124 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 99.8
Write 114
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 124
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6.1
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 5R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 7% 85 150 58 60 15.5" 1920 1080 AUO61ED
Typical 80Y5 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80Y5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback