Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive549% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 194
2-Core 390
120% 227 Pts
4-Core 730
8-Core 1,209
118% 970 Pts
64-Core 1,792
111% 1,792 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Asus(1043 05E7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 145
Parallax 308
125% 202 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 159
Splatting 214
174% 214 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 133%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4379 4663 4630 4694 4347 2923 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
549% Outstanding
Read 2,680
Write 4,608
Mixed 3,250
SusWrite 4,273
842% 3,702 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 108
357% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,789
DQ Write 1,350
DQ Mixed 1,589
1,183% 1,576 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 549%
Great: 614%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
79GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,860
Write 3,079
Mixed 2,875
658% 2,938 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 91.4
301% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,289
DQ Mixed 1,449
1,089% 1,462 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
49GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12,175
Mixed 19.5
4,021% 6,097 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
141% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
SPCC Sol id State Disk 1TB
481GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 371 361 366 364 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 348
Write 378
Mixed 317
SusWrite 367
485% 353 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 20.4
1,732% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 15.7
1,680% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 222%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5800 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
193% Outstanding
MC Read 76.9
MC Write 65
MC Mixed 69.2
201% 70.4 GB/s
SC Read 65.6
SC Write 59.8
SC Mixed 59.3
176% 61.6 GB/s
Latency 56.7
70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 193%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback