Supermicro X11SSQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X11SSQ  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SSQ
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 502
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 139
Parallax 127
102% 131 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 132
Splatting 117
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 698 916 938 1016 1002 989 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,194
Write 963
Mixed 694
SusWrite 926
212% 944 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 45.2
139% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 697
519% 690 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 179%
Great: 302%
Intel SSDSC2KB960G8 960GB
752GB free
Firmware: XCV10132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 369 367 391 386 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 376
Write 390
Mixed 322
SusWrite 363
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 29.6
100% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 292
225% 303 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82%
Great: 96%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
21GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 425
Mixed 333
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 44.8
147% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 343
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 115 115 117 109 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 82.8
Write 162
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 117
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
278% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 60 23" 1920 1080 LEN1115 LEN LI2321swA
Typical X11SSQ Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X11SSQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback