Asus GL553VE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VE
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 09:23
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 500
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 30
Parallax 7.3
6% 15.1 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 125 130 127 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 171
Write 122
Mixed 153
SusWrite 126
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 21.4
100% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 120
116% 189 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 70 72 72 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 45.9
Write 54.9
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 70.2
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V06D4SF8GB5285282666 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D5
Typical GL553VE Builds (Compare 1,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback