Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 16:31
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 34.2 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 92.4 28% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 298 35% 273 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Asus(1043 04C4) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 108 Parallax 171 84% 127 fps	MRender 89.2 Gravity 133 Splatting 73.5 78% 98.4 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 5.4 33 3.8 4.9 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 316 Write 286 Mixed 237 SusWrite 33.5 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 10 32% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 86.1 DQ Mixed 42.6 48% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 61%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35,039 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 165 174 178 193 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 108 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 172 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 252% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GIS 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 7 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	6	60	48.8"	1280 720	SAM0F9C C49RG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	185x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	94x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	76x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	59x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	41x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16