Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1T6

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1T6 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131122
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 09:25
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 43.4 2-Core 84.2 41% 64.5 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 127 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA33) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.07 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 697GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 352 372 278 368 374 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 387 Write 356 Mixed 348 SusWrite 349 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 29.6 97% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 314 227% 293 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	25	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMO1592

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-1T6 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1T6

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	3x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 42%, 251 samples	2x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 9 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 ASint SSY3128M8-EDJ1F 5GBSamsungBench 37%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16