Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1T6

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1T6 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131122
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '23 at 15:40
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 55 2-Core 96.5 44% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 127 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA33) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.83 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 697GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 361 390 341 401 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 407 Write 370 Mixed 368 SusWrite 368 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 33.4 106% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 329 244% 322 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-1T6 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1T6

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	3x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $105Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 42%, 251 samples	2x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 9 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 ASint SSY3128M8-EDJ1F 5GBSamsungBench 37%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16