Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

11 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '23 at 06:47
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 62.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 190 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 514 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	44.8% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 51.3 48% 57 fps	MRender 41.3 Gravity 51.1 Splatting 48.8 39% 47.1 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 412 382 365 306 308 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 1,128 Write 977 Mixed 933 SusWrite 369 190% 852 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 50.5 141% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 677 507% 680 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 187%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 867GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 88 88 87 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 81.6 Mixed 66 SusWrite 87.6 62% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 194% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 25.2 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 19.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	29	120	15.5"	1536 793	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,843x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	984x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,364x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	951x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	511x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,161x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	408x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	591x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16