Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

12 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '23 at 06:08
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 47.1 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 180 56% 105 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 383 44% 343 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 57.6 Reflection 61.1 Parallax 50.7 47% 56.5 fps	MRender 41.4 Gravity 50.4 Splatting 48.5 39% 46.8 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 356 369 385 403 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 557 Write 514 Mixed 542 SusWrite 375 112% 497 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 69.2 4K Mixed 35.8 100% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 781 DQ Write 527 DQ Mixed 634 478% 647 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 187%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 862GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 81.3 Write 64 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 87.5 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 146% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.2% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 20.5 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	120	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,851x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	989x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,373x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	953x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	513x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,166x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	409x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	381x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	594x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16