Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 21:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 176
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 531
50% 418 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.4% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 33.7
28% 34.7 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 0.2
17% 24.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 4.3 5.2 2.7 5.2 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 416
Write 308
Mixed 300
SusWrite 32.8
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 15.5
66% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 43.8
46% 77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
107GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 120 119 121 114 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 160
Write 156
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 116
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-094.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0947 T24B530
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback