Asus H61M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '23 at 20:10
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2030-$24 18,277 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 60 2-Core 89.9 45% 70.9 Pts	4-Core 86.5 8-Core 96.7 12% 91.6 Pts	64-Core 92.4 6% 92.4 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 19.9 16% 19.5 fps	MRender 25.5 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 17 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB 779 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 86 138 149 162 54 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.9% Below average	Read 172 Write 102 Mixed 151 SusWrite 121 31% 136 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 17.4 56% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 150 115% 157 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 464GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 71 105 111 121 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 109 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 92 67% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 269 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	25	5	60	21.3"	1680 1050	ACI19AA ASUS VW198

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	332x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	265x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	188x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	441x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	146x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16