LG B75PS.AR3800D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLG B75PS.AR3800D  (all builds)
MotherboardPC A236
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 19:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 160
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 251
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Device(7377 0000) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.44
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 13% Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 203 199 220 226 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 186
Write 177
Mixed 191
SusWrite 207
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 19.9
67% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 185
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
464GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 116 119 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66% Good
Read 113
Write 109
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 117
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 40" 1280 720 OPD3150 324IGZO-HDMI2
Typical B75PS.AR3800D Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: LG B75PS.AR3800D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback